What is the same about TwN and just add water?
There are a significant number of similarities between the play Twelfth Night and the film just add water. Just one of the many is the similarity between Orsino, the Duke of Illyria, and the citizens of Trona. Orsino wants to be with Olivia, but he's too lazy to try to get her himself. In comparison, the citizens left in Trona are just as lazy about leaving the town. They just wait for rain after it hasn't rained for years. Also, I think Olivia finding out that Viola's not a man is very comparable to Ray finding out that Jonah Hill is not his son. In conclusion, both the film and the play lack a sense of normality, which is the main similarity between the two. In Twelfth Night, you have a woman pretending to be a man that ends up falling in love with a man who's in love with another woman who's in love with the woman that's pretending to be a man. In just add water, you have a town where it hasn't rained in years, where people are just about crazy, where people don't attempt to better their lives, where men hire prostitutes to take an 18-year old's virginity. Bottom line, they're just not normal. They're actually really weird. And there's much more between the two that are similar than one might first think.
Monday, April 26, 2010
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Bigfoot
Food miles are “the distance a product travels from the farm to your home” (Specter, 276). Michael Specter’s Bigfoot talks about the global warming problem on our planet and how to fix it. The main suggestion in the article is to create a carbon-neutral community so pollution is greatly reduced. To be exact, this would be equivalent to taking 100,000 cars with all of those toxic gases and fumes off of the street. The food miles are a big deal because, like the example in the article, you can just get food from a local farm, but if it’s not quality, eating the potatoes from the farm could be just like eating French fries from the local McDonalds, which is why food miles are extremely important. It’s better to get your food from farther for maybe a little bit more money than not because the quality is much better, and the carbon footprint is nearly non-existant.
I do not personally feel responsible for global warming. I think that everyone in the world is a little responsible for it because, let’s face it, we did this to ourselves. With all the Hummer H3s riding around and all the extra pollution, it was bound to happen. I might be a little responsible, but I’m certainly not going to put a lot of the blame on myself when there are over 2 billion humans on the planet that had just as big, probably bigger, a part in the cause of global warming as I did.
I do not personally feel responsible for global warming. I think that everyone in the world is a little responsible for it because, let’s face it, we did this to ourselves. With all the Hummer H3s riding around and all the extra pollution, it was bound to happen. I might be a little responsible, but I’m certainly not going to put a lot of the blame on myself when there are over 2 billion humans on the planet that had just as big, probably bigger, a part in the cause of global warming as I did.
Just Add Water Questions
1. What's in Ray's tin can?
2. How did Charlene go so long cheating on Ray before he found out?
3. Why have the people in Trona stayed there so long if there's been a drought for years?
4. How is Danny DeVito's character connected to Ray?
5. When will Ray and Nora get together?
6. Why wouldn't Jonah Hill's character not know his own Grandma and not care that she's dying?
2. How did Charlene go so long cheating on Ray before he found out?
3. Why have the people in Trona stayed there so long if there's been a drought for years?
4. How is Danny DeVito's character connected to Ray?
5. When will Ray and Nora get together?
6. Why wouldn't Jonah Hill's character not know his own Grandma and not care that she's dying?
Collaborative Learning and the Conversation of Mankind
Kenneth Bruffee’s Collaborative Learning and the “Conversation of Mankind” attempts to say that knowledge is gained by working with peers. I’m sure this is a true statement, but when asking the question “does knowing require contact with another intellect?”, I’m not so sure. Sure, contact with a peer can help you gain knowledge, but I don’t think that human contact is required to gain knowledge. There are some types of knowledge that can only be gained via human interaction, but, for the most part, I feel that it is not needed to do so in gaining knowledge for school and other things. Don’t get me wrong, I feel like I work best when in a group, but I don’t think that is the only way to work. In fact, I’m sitting here in my room working on this blog alone. There’s no one around me, and I’d say I’m doing a pretty fine job.
I know people that can just sit in their room and read for 3-4 hours and have gained an insane amount of knowledge in that amount of time just by reading something and studying it. It’s not a far-fetched idea to say this, because so many people do it. You see people studying alone in the library every day, gaining knowledge and applying it to real-life situations. In the article, Bruffee talks about peer tutoring, where, instead of getting tutored by an elder, the student gets tutored by another student. This is a great way to work, and it is a great example of Collaborative Learning at work. By peer tutoring, both the tutor and the person being tutored can gain knowledge; not just the person being tutored. Not only can a tutor help the person being tutored, but the tutor can also learn from what he/she is evaluating and use that to make their own works of writing better.
While personally, I prefer collaborative learning to studying on my own, I don’t think that being alone restricts you from gaining knowledge having to do with education. Street smarts? Maybe. No, scratch that. Definitely. But for education purposes where you only need to know certain subjects? I don’t think it matters in the long run whether or not you’re working alone or with others to expand on the knowledge you have already.
I know people that can just sit in their room and read for 3-4 hours and have gained an insane amount of knowledge in that amount of time just by reading something and studying it. It’s not a far-fetched idea to say this, because so many people do it. You see people studying alone in the library every day, gaining knowledge and applying it to real-life situations. In the article, Bruffee talks about peer tutoring, where, instead of getting tutored by an elder, the student gets tutored by another student. This is a great way to work, and it is a great example of Collaborative Learning at work. By peer tutoring, both the tutor and the person being tutored can gain knowledge; not just the person being tutored. Not only can a tutor help the person being tutored, but the tutor can also learn from what he/she is evaluating and use that to make their own works of writing better.
While personally, I prefer collaborative learning to studying on my own, I don’t think that being alone restricts you from gaining knowledge having to do with education. Street smarts? Maybe. No, scratch that. Definitely. But for education purposes where you only need to know certain subjects? I don’t think it matters in the long run whether or not you’re working alone or with others to expand on the knowledge you have already.
Friday, April 23, 2010
FFW: Just Add Water
What emblem/image/symbol best exemplifies the film "Just Add Water"?
I think that a flower best exemplifies the film. In the movie, Trona had been in a drought for years, and everyone left had developed some sort of mental problem over the years of the drought. Huge chunks of peoples' personalities were just ripped out of their bodies. Much of them began to die, but Ray changed that at the end, and when it began raining at the end of the film, it seemed as if the citizens of Trona were "coming back to life," in a figurative sense. This resembles a flower as a flower needs water, or it begins to droop down and eventually die. The flower represents the citizens of Trona, and when both the flower and the city get watered, it's like a reviving rain. It completely changes the outlook in such a short amount of time, and revives what makes these people: their personalities.
I think that a flower best exemplifies the film. In the movie, Trona had been in a drought for years, and everyone left had developed some sort of mental problem over the years of the drought. Huge chunks of peoples' personalities were just ripped out of their bodies. Much of them began to die, but Ray changed that at the end, and when it began raining at the end of the film, it seemed as if the citizens of Trona were "coming back to life," in a figurative sense. This resembles a flower as a flower needs water, or it begins to droop down and eventually die. The flower represents the citizens of Trona, and when both the flower and the city get watered, it's like a reviving rain. It completely changes the outlook in such a short amount of time, and revives what makes these people: their personalities.
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Writing Center
My experience at the writing center was extremely helpful. The writing center instructor gave me a lot of tips on my Twelfth Night Essay. I came into it having done 2 ½ paragraphs and getting myself stuck, but we worked for a little while and I got myself out of the rut that I was in. Joe C, my instructor, tried helping me with the direction I was going with the paper, and we changed a good amount of the first body paragraph, and we completely changed the second one. I feel like it helped my essay greatly, and I think it was a great experience. I definitely feel that the writing center is a huge help, and it'll definitely be the first place I go to revise my next essay, and many essays after.
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Reality Tests
In the article “The Reality Tests,” author Joshua Roebke raises an interesting question: “Do we create what we observe through the act of our observations?” The simple answer to this question is yes. Two different people can see one common thing and make two completely different observations. It’s all dependent on one’s perception of what they’re looking at. In the article, Roebke uses many physics examples, but that’s definitely not the only subject in which this statement holds true. For example, for a vegetarian person, Buffalo wings can seem disgusting and horrible while, to a regular meat eater, they look absolutely delectable. Another example is in sports. If a team wins the championship, there are going to be just as many unhappy fans as there are happy ones. Like I said, it all depends on the person’s perception of the subject matter.
Roebke’s thesis is a fantastic one and has a great amount of room to expand on. It’s mind-boggling that so many people can look at one thing and have so many different ideas and perceptions about it. The thesis shows how Roebke chooses to write. Instead of stating the answer to his question and making it obvious, he makes the reader think. He makes us look at the writing piece and realize that we really do create our own observations.
Roebke’s thesis is a fantastic one and has a great amount of room to expand on. It’s mind-boggling that so many people can look at one thing and have so many different ideas and perceptions about it. The thesis shows how Roebke chooses to write. Instead of stating the answer to his question and making it obvious, he makes the reader think. He makes us look at the writing piece and realize that we really do create our own observations.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)